Talk:Rance Quest

Quest details are out. 76.169.38.22 02:28, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Trivia Dispute
You seem to really hate AliceSoft for parodying Dragon Quest? :) I would like to clarify that the 1st person perspective probably ain't intended to be a copy of Dragon Quest, the first person view was implemented in Toushin Toshi III before Rance 8. Also I will be removing words like "unashamedly" coz it sounds like you're taking a dig at AliceSoft, this kind of tone shouldn't be there in a wiki article. Gahahahahahahahaha!! 05:58, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * How the hell is using a simple adjective considered flaming, sir? The word you used, "bluntly," isn't any different from words like "unashamedly" and "boldy." You need to calm down, and think carefully before I really start lashing. And if you've been keeping tabs on their blog, they clearly said it themselves. It's intentional. 76.169.38.22 06:27, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * First, "bluntly" isn't my word, "blantly" was already there, I fixed the spelling only. Also I changed it to "rather bluntly" to make it sound relatively mild. Gahahahahahahahaha!! 06:45, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * That was a typo. Should have been "blatantly." 76.169.38.22 06:56, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * Second, I'm not lashing and yes, I know they clearly said it themselves, while even "sniggering" a little, but still they just wanted to sound funny, not an attitude like "we'll copy whoever the fu** we want to, do whatever you want about it", which is an attitude the word "unashamedly/shamelessly" conveys (it implies "they should be ashamed of what they've done"). I know they were "not shameful" about the parody, it's just about wording it the right way. "not ashamed" and "shameless/unashamed" don't have the same tone to them. Gahahahahahahahaha!! 06:45, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Whatever, I'm not arguing about word usage, which is all subjective, here. What I'm concerned about was your attitude. All you had to do was silently remove words you didn't like; not antagonize me due to poor judgment on your part. 76.169.38.22 06:56, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * If I did it silently it'd make me look like some ass who just edits stuff as he pleases (although your current attitude tells me you think the same about me right now anyway). Point of argument is to resolve and find out which one's right (or more right) to put in. Gahahahahahahahaha!! 07:21, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you wouldn't look like an ass. Editing as you wish is the whole point of Wiki's. 76.169.38.22 07:35, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

And totally deleting the "Trivia" section isn't a way to "end this", that's destructive to the articles just because you're beginning to feel frustrated. If there is trivia about this game, that part needs to be there. It's not like the logo part is false or anything. I didn't mean to offend you from the beginning, just asking where you getting your info from and about the wording, it did contain that kind of attitude even if you didn't intend to be raging at AliceSoft. You yourself have lost your temper faster it seems. I'm going to restore the trivia, but just the wording changed; further I'll draw Afker's and a few other users attention to see if I'm in the wrong somehow. Now cheer up and keep up the good work :PGahahahahahahahaha!! 07:16, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, enjoy the broken English all over the Wiki. 76.169.38.22 07:27, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Also can you point me to a source that has AliceSoft confirming even the battle system is intended to be a Dragon Quest copy? Anyone who's played Toushin Toshi 3 and Sengoku Rance will know it's a combination of those two. Gahahahahahahahaha!! 06:45, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * You sure talk a lot--asking for concrete proof--after starting a lecture about what a certain word implies. How about you just edit out what you don't like instead of talking? http://blog.alicesoft.com/archives/2130640.html 76.169.38.22 07:01, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, there aren't for the battle system. It's made damn obvious though. You're an expert on implications, right? 76.169.38.22 07:04, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I daresay most people who have played the 2 games I mentioned will be as much of an expert of implications as (you think) I am, more so when the newer releases of Dragon Quest have 3rd person elements in their battle system (which Rance 8 and TT3 don't have). Gahahahahahahahaha!! 07:14, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, good for you. Ask people whether they agree with the attitude you started too. You still haven't apologized after I jokingly, like Alicesoft, used some words. No where did I say Rance Quest is a rip-off, or any of that. 76.169.38.22 07:16, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Very well, I will indeed ask people about my attitude compared to yours; I was the one who started the conversation with a smiling face when you suddenly started thinking "I was acting like a kid","I talk a lot" and what not when all I asked for was clarification on some fronts, be it be including "why you think what you think". I do apologize to you for making you feel frustrated, but when things are opinions, they need to be stated as such (especially when there's a high probability that more than one such opinion can be a true fact) like how you stated "fans think the boxshot is a copy of Fire Emblem". In any case, if it makes you feel better, as stated above, I will draw the attention of others to decide on it. EDIT: Sorry about this mess, Afker. It's upto you to do the damage control. I didn't intend for it to turn out like this, but... *Sigh* -_-Gahahahahahahahaha!! 07:35, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's right. Blame it on me. Also, there's something called sarcasm. Smilies aren't as great you think. 76.169.38.22 07:51, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Guys, just relax... -Afker All hail AliceSoft! 07:30, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, after reading through the history of the edits and the discussions... *Afker smacks Sailabc1 with a giant smelly trout*. While it's right to bring up issues to discuss on the talk page and explain why you did something, that WAS very unnecessarily antagonizing. Now, if anybody wants to discuss the trivia about battle system or the package art, start a new section. And if whatever somebody wrote annoys/frustrates/angers you, let it sit for 24 hours before responding. That sometimes can actually help the discussion be slightly more constructive. *slightly annoyed* <- *Afker smacks self for not following his own advice* -Afker All hail AliceSoft! 07:52, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * *Raises hand from under the giant smelly trout* =___= Just the "You seem to really hate AliceSoft for parodying Dragon Quest?" part? I thought words like "blatantly" and "unashamedly" sounded pretty stingy. Oh well... Gahahahahahahahaha!! 07:59, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * Also the expressed judgment on "coz it sounds like you're taking a dig at AliceSoft". While I also would've removed those two words from the article myself, I tend to disassociate a person's motivations/opinions/actions with the words the person used. Using something else as an example to explore the same point: What you wrote was unnecessarily antagonizing, but I do not assume you intended to maliciously antagonize 76.169.38.22 (you might or might not have); I just react to the words you wrote, in a way that makes sense no matter what your intentions were.
 * The overall "I am gonna do foo. Bar doesn't belong here" wording is also just overall quite arrogant, regardless of whether you happen to be right or wrong about foo and bar. -Afker All hail AliceSoft! 08:15, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Proxy for the new patch?
Can't seem to download the patch says Japan only. Anyone upload to mediafire or the like? Tried anonymouse to no avail